🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to resume atomic negotiations with Washington as long as it is approached with "dignity" and "honor", Tehran's foreign minister has announced.

The Iranian diplomat declared solely negotiations was effective, and shared new appeals had originated from go-betweens to resume negotiations with the American leadership. He claimed Iran had zero secret atomic facilities, and Iran could not yet allow the global atomic watchdog to visit struck enrichment centers for security reasons.

Navigating a Challenging Route

The foreign minister is navigating a challenging route since Iran wishes not to be seen to be operating from a stance of vulnerability, and he emphatically stated that Iran had arisen stronger in military terms and psychologically from the joint assault on its nuclear sites in June.

He was speaking at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "an inalienable right to refine atomic fuel within its borders that it will perpetually retain" – the key factor of the impasse in the previous talks.

Earlier Talks Suddenly Ended

The prior phases of discussions between the US and Iran were ended suddenly and bitter conclusion on 12 June when Israel, with US support, struck Tehran's atomic facilities in a fortnight-long engagement that concluded with the American leader declaring the locations had been eliminated. Afterward, Western states exercised their authority to restore global restrictions, but Iran insists they have not had a major impact.

Ideal Resolution Suggested

Iran's diplomats said they felt they had reached a "ideal resolution" to the uranium processing matter in previous talks, when it was settled an Iran-based consortium with Washington's engagement could process nuclear material. The two nations would have been able to claim victory since domestic enrichment would have persisted and the US could be assured that Iran's nuclear programme was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been decided in the negotiations that Washington's technical specialists could operate on Iranian soil, but that was a reasonable assumption of the partnership suggestion. Representatives asserted repeatedly they had achieved a deal with Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff only for the deal to collapse due to "detractors in America".

Current Position

Iranian officials declared the cooperative arrangement was now off the table, but it seems very probable the suggestion could be revived in various formats if discussions restart.

Trump in recent days said he had been getting signals that Iran desired to reopen negotiations, but in private Tehran representatives claim they are not yet getting coherent offers from Washington either directly or from significant local go-betweens, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Iranian foreign ministry has been charged of non-responsiveness in the face of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Iran asserts negotiations is not part of a performance.

Political Stance

In his speech to the gathering, intended to paint the US as a hegemonic power that misuses the concept of international law, the foreign minister said the two-week conflict showed the dispute could not be ended by combat operations. He stated the strikes started with a US demand for an unconditional Iranian surrender and ended with an unconditional call for a ceasefire.

Iran is certain the initial Israeli attacks were executed with complete American awareness and coordination, making trust hard to rebuild.

Diplomacy Stays the Ultimate Solution

Araghchi declared: "It was not Iran that had fled diplomacy; it was America and the Western nations that had repeatedly tried to impose their will during the discussions. Negotiations can still be alive and remains the ultimate resolution to address conflicts, but its standards, regulations and tenets must be adhered to."

"In case they talk to the Iranian people with the language of dignity and honor, they will get a answer in the identical language."

Restoration and Rebuilding

In what is described by Iranian officials as the struggle of recovery and reconstruction, the foreign minister claimed he was certain Iran's military capacities "are considerably enhanced than before 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been restored. We learned multiple understandings from this conflict; we have identified our internal vulnerabilities and the shortcomings of the enemy."

He continued: "We effectively endured this engagement. Our enrichment knowledge, which they intended to destroy, continues to exist. The installations and equipment, if destroyed, will be restored; what is crucial is the resolve of the Iranian people and then the national cohesion that they aimed at, but were unable to destroy. The citizens of Tehran have grown stronger, more cohesive, and more supportive of the administration and the state in the aftermath of this invasion."